Net neutrality vs free speech

I am technologist by trade — a web developer — so you’ll have to pardon me if I get a bit worked up on places where tech intersects politics. You’ve heard me harp on the issue (and threat) of net neutrality legislation. Time for more!

My basic argument has been that differentiated, premium services are part of a healthy and forward-looking market. The proposed legislation actually makes it illegal to charge for better service and build the better network. It is an attempt to cast the ‘net as a public utility, emulating our sclerotic power and traditional telephone systems.

We need to think about the next generation of high-bandwidth ‘net services and leave all options on the table. Skype, Google, iTunes and a hundred other life-enhancing innovations were neither anticipated nor sanctioned by the government. We can’t possibly know what will exist in five years, and we are perennially on the verge of a new wave of amazing things. Let’s not regulate them before they exist.

That’s the background, so let’s go further: network neutrality legislation should be fought on grounds of free speech.

Free speech, as in the First Amendment, means that government cannot restrict the means of communication. Free speech also means that individuals and companies can decide what is said, and not said, using their resources.

Even if you are attracted to the idea of net neutrality as a concept (I am not), consider this: the likelihood of a federal bureaucracy correctly defining “neutrality” is about as high as its defining “decency”.

Think about recent attempts to legislate decency. Do you feel like the FCC are overstepping their bounds, applying a crude hand, perhaps even violating the First Amendment? I do too.

We should apply this thinking to such attempts to proscribe how bits cross the wire. The proposed neutrality legislation is exactly that: a law that dictates how private network traffic must be managed.

That network traffic, in my humble opinion, is speech. It’s not a question of finding the right kind of law. It is a question of whether the government is within their right to legislate at all. I say no.

----

News.com has very good coverage of recent developments. Some of it is encouraging, such as Randolph May’s piece, which posits that we should approach claims of network abuses on a case-by-case basis, with existing law.

Also, the PFF blog has an inspiring note from a technologist who gives a scientist-in-the-trenches account of why now is exactly the wrong time to legislate. I would excerpt it, except that I found every sentence to be pithy and valuable. I suggest you simply read it yourself.

Comments

[air jordans]

Economy the poor's mints,extravagance the rich man'spitfall. Do you understand?

[Impotence causes]

Hi everyone, good evening, my name is Carl, I share my views with you. The phone is a very interesting step forward, in fact I did not imagine how my life would have been without the phone, is a very simple science, yet a few decades ago was something that had been considered crazy. I am very grateful for sharing with you my opinion.

[Air jodan shoes]

Fascinating post, and what a good clip in the past. searching forward to examining your long term articles

[Cheap viagra]

Greetings to all, I consider myself a fan of good articles, this blog is very good, has a great personality, is very original, very comprehensive, usually has very good features, for that reason I will recommend to my friends, I think when you find a good article must be shared.

[UGG Adirondack II Boots]

This is a best blog since I have been seen from the website. Good luck with you, your dream will come true soon.

[chanel bags]

Work banishes those three great evils: boredom, vice ,and poverty.

----------- by Voltaire, French Philosopher

[retro jordan 13]

Thank you for your opiniones and words, dear brothers!
David: yes, in our Spanish speaking world ABBA BIBLES is the only one that rebinds Bibles with high quality leathers and methods. I asked them to upgrade their website, because there will be a lot of people interested in their services. And for Spanish, well, it's the language of Heaven! Isn't it?
Esteban & Abraham: yes, the RVR60 is the most used and trusted Bible in our Spanish speaking churches. The RVR95 is just the last revision of that one, and only affects some words and the order of poetry, but not the Reina-Valera principles. I also have another Bibles versions rebounded by Abba Bibles, and like Mark said, today just is the beggining of the posts about them. Be patient!

[Generic Cialis]

I would like to appreciate the great work done by You

Please continue posting like this

[ROSTISLAVEmeljanov]

Недорогие пассажирские перевозки по Киеве

[Nike Air Max 2009]

Your blog is so wonderful to keep sight of! You are such a amazing person to do this and share it with all of us. I will continue to look through where you post something good on it. And I will keep your wonderful blog in my memory. Be safe and healthy! God Bless!